Collaboration

A noticeboard that gathers the document reviews waiting on you and the newest unresolved comments from across your compliance records, each with a link to the record where the work actually happens.

While people draft policies, procedures, compliance documents and evidence, they leave notes for one another and ask a colleague to check a document before it is approved. Those conversations live on each record's own detail page, so a request can sit unread for weeks in a corner of Aegis you rarely open. The Collaboration page pulls two of those streams into one place — the reviews (requests to check a document before it is approved) where you are the named reviewer, and the most recent open comments (notes left on a record that nobody has marked as resolved) from anywhere in the team.

Read it as a noticeboard rather than a workspace: it lists and links, while the reading, replying and deciding happen on the record you open from here. You reach it from the Collaboration entry in the Documents group of the left sidebar, at /collaboration.

Who uses it

Opening the page needs the View Comments permission (collab:comment:read), which all four standard roles hold, so Admin, Manager, Contributor and Viewer all see the same two lists. Anyone without it is sent to /unauthorized rather than shown a blank page. Collaboration is also an operator-provisioned module: if your tenant does not have it switched on, the sidebar entry does not appear and the route refuses the request.

What you can then do on the record you open differs sharply by role:

Role On the collaboration panel of a record opened from this page
Admin Read the comment thread, post a comment, see the reviews list, and record a decision — Approve, Request changes or Reject.
Manager The same as Admin: read, comment, see reviews, and decide them.
Contributor Read the thread, post a comment and see the reviews list — but not decide a review. The three decision buttons are not rendered.
Viewer Read the comment thread only. No comment box, and the Reviews section of the panel is hidden altogether.
A Contributor can be named as reviewer but cannot record the decision

Nothing stops a review being assigned to a Contributor, and it will duly appear in their Reviews assigned to me list. When they open the record, though, the decision buttons are withheld, because recording a decision needs the Review & Decide permission (collab:review:decide) that only Manager and Admin hold. If you are routing approvals, name a Manager or an Admin as the reviewer.

What's on this screen

The page is deliberately plain. A header carries the title Collaboration over a one-line description — "Pending reviews assigned to you and the latest open comments across documents." There is no create button, no filter bar, no search box and no export on the page itself, so the only controls are the ones in the frame around it: the left sidebar and the top bar.

Below the header sit two stacked sections, each a bordered panel:

Both lists are read once when the page loads, ordered newest first, and capped at the 25 most recent items. In the capture the two sections are in different states, which is normal. Reviews assigned to me has nothing waiting, so it shows its message in place of a list: "No reviews assigned to you. Comments and review requests on policies, procedures, compliance documents, and evidence will appear here." Recent open comments has two rows, both left by Test Admin 1 on a policy, each with its own Open link. The matching empty message for the second section reads "No open comments. Threads opened on policies, procedures, documents, or evidence will surface here." The signed-in account in the capture is Test Contributor 1, a Contributor.

Because the page has no controls of its own beyond those Open links, the numbered callouts below point at the frame around it.

  1. The circled question mark in the top bar opens the in-app User Guide at the chapter for the screen you are on. It is a link rather than a panel, so you leave the page and return with your browser's back control.
  2. Read the signed-in name at the top right. Reviews assigned to me is filtered to exactly this account, so this is where you confirm you are clearing your own queue and not a colleague's. In the capture it reads Test Contributor 1.
  3. Select the Compliance group in the sidebar to expand it. It holds three of the four record types these lists draw from — Policies, Procedures and Evidence — for when you would rather browse a register than follow a link.
  4. The Documents group holds the fourth type, Compliance Documents, alongside the Collaboration entry that brought you to this page. The group stays collapsed until you select it.
  5. Administration at the foot of the sidebar holds Settings, whose Users tab is where roles are assigned. If a review is sitting with someone who cannot decide it, that is put right there — read Roles overview first.
The Collaboration page as a Contributor sees it: an empty reviews section above two open comment rows, with callouts on the help link, the signed-in user and three sidebar groups — /collaboration.
The Collaboration page as a Contributor sees it: an empty reviews section above two open comment rows, with callouts on the help link, the signed-in user and three sidebar groups — /collaboration.

Working through a review assigned to you

Open it at the start of a session: read what is yours, clear it on the record, come back.

  1. Read the row in Reviews assigned to me. It names the record type, who requested the review, and where the review has got to — Pending if nobody has picked it up, In Review if someone has.
  2. Select Open at the right of the row. For a policy or a compliance document you land on the detail page scrolled straight to its Collaboration panel. For a procedure or an evidence item the link opens the detail page, but no collaboration panel is mounted there yet — see the note below.
  3. In the panel, read the Reviews section. Each entry shows Requested by and the requester's name, the current status as a small grey badge, a Reviewer: line where a reviewer is named, and any note stored with the request.
  4. If you hold Manager or Admin, choose Approve, Request changes or Reject. All three buttons grey out while the decision is saved, a short "Decision recorded." confirmation appears, and the entry's status badge updates in place. The buttons only appear on reviews still at Pending or In Review. Deciding a review that was still Pending also records you as its reviewer.
  5. Return to /collaboration and reload. A review that is no longer Pending or In Review has dropped off the list, so what remains is what is still outstanding.
Request changes closes the review as Rejected

Aegis stores your choice of Request changes as its own decision, but the review itself only has five states — Pending, In Review, Approved, Rejected and Cancelled — and both Request changes and Reject move it to Rejected. There is no "changes requested" status and no way to reopen the review, so put what you want changed in a comment on the record, and ask for a fresh review once it is done.

Procedures and evidence have no collaboration panel yet

The panel that shows the thread and the review buttons is currently mounted on policy and compliance document detail pages only. An Open link on a procedure or evidence row takes you to the right record, but there is nowhere on that page to read the comment or decide the review. Comments and reviews on those two types can still be created and read through the collaboration API; the screens are planned but not shipped.

Following an open comment

The second list is team-wide, so a row may sit on a record somebody else owns. Scan it for what touches your work rather than trying to clear all of it.

  1. Read the comment row. The first line is the comment text, cut off at the width of the panel if it is long; the second line names the author and the record type, so Test Admin 1 · policy is a comment left by Test Admin 1 on a policy.
  2. Select Open to go to that record. The full comment and any replies sit in the Comments section of its Collaboration panel, each entry showing the author, a short date and time, and the complete text. Replies are indented beneath the comment they answer.
  3. To add your own, type in the Add a comment box below the thread — it takes up to 10,000 characters — then select Post comment. The button stays disabled until you have typed something, then reads Posting… while it saves; the thread refreshes and "Comment added." appears. The box is only rendered for roles that may comment, so a Viewer will not see it.

The box always posts a new top-level comment. There is no control for replying to a particular comment, so make it clear in your text which point you are answering.

Where each Open link takes you

Aegis collects comments and reviews on four kinds of record:

Record type shown in the row Where Open lands
policy The policy detail page, scrolled to its collaboration panel.
compliance document The compliance document detail page, scrolled to its collaboration panel.
procedure The procedure detail page. No collaboration panel is shown there yet.
evidence The evidence detail page. No collaboration panel is shown there yet.

How the two lists fill and empty

A review joins the first list when someone names you as its reviewer, and leaves once its status moves past Pending or In Review — once it is approved, rejected or cancelled. A comment joins the second list when it is posted and would leave once it is marked as resolved — which nothing in the interface currently does. The two sections are independent, so one can be full while the other shows its empty message, as in the capture above. An empty Reviews assigned to me means you are up to date, not that something has gone wrong.

No screen requests a review, and no screen resolves a comment

Aegis reserves a Request Review permission for Contributor and above, and a Resolve Comments permission for Manager and Admin, but neither has a button anywhere in the product yet. A review request has to be raised through the collaboration API, which is what puts rows into Reviews assigned to me. Resolving a comment goes further still: there is no API for it either — only internal code — so a comment stays in Recent open comments until it ages out of the 25 most recent. Close a discussion by replying on the record so the thread reads as finished.

Tips and limits

Where this connects

The records these lists point at are covered in Policies, Procedures, Compliance documents and Evidence. For who may comment, request a review and decide one, see Roles overview. For the sidebar groups the callouts point at, see The left menu; for other work waiting on you, see Action items and the Dashboard.